Skip to content Skip to navigation

Three arrested in Kokrajhar

KOKRAJHAR: Police apprehended three persons including a government employee involved with cheating related cases from Kokrajhar town on Thursday.

According to Police, Kokrajhar and Guwahati police have jointly carried out a search operation and apprehended the trio. They have been identified as Alok Sen (49) of Prince Golam Hossain Shah Road, Kolkata, Pradip Kalita (42) of Jamalpur of Kamrup rural and Manoj Kumar Deka (75) of Geetanagar, Guwahati. Kalita is a fourth grade government employee in PHE department.

Author info

AT Kokrajhar Bureau's picture

Assam Times Kokrajhar bureau office, BTAD.

Add new comment


Republish this content

Lifetime Achievement Award to JFMC Bhairabkunda

14 Aug 2016 - 4:07pm | Jayanta Kumar Das

Kaziranga Wildlife Society (KWS)held its annual Nature Conservation Day in memory of its founder president Padmashree Robin Banerjee at the pensioners Bhawan at Chandmari in Guwahati on August 12.On the occasion the KWS Lifetime Achievement Award was presented to JFMC forest of Bhairabkunda (Gedsimani Forest) in Udalguri district.The JFMC comprising local vill;agers were instrumental in transforming a vast stretch of barren land (5500 bighas) into a green forest which today sheltres wide ranging wildlife.Delivering key note address on wildlife in urban areas of Assam,writter and conservationist Dr.Anowaruddin Choudhury said that the so called man animal conflict conflict was actually a misnomer as the animals have no role in the conflict.Senior journalist Wasbir Hussain also stressed the need for media sensitization on the issue and training for media personnel.Ismail Daimari secretary of the JFMC said that the villagers of six villages near Assam-Arunachal-Bhutah  had begun an endeavour in 2007 with first plantation and since then they had planted more than 14 lakhs trees.The barren land is now a green oasis sheltering wilde range of animals and birds including wild elephants,bears,deer, leopards etc.Journalist Mubina Akhtar,secretary of Kaziranga Wildlife Society in her inaugural speech explained the purpose of the event and welcomed all the distinguished guests while senior journalist Pranay Bordoloi conducted the proceedings.The JFMC delegation felicitated a few conservation workers namely-Padum Borthakur,President;Prashanta Gogoi,Working President;Mubina Akhtar, Secretary of Kaziranga Wildlife Society;Parvati Barooah(Hasti Kanya);senior journalist cum wildlife activist Pranoy Bordoloi  and wildlife activist Jayanta Kumar Das

Small tea growers decries government apathy

6 Jul 2018 - 10:48pm | AT Kokrajhar Bureau

KOKRAJHAR:  The small tea growers of the state have been deprived from getting genuine prices while selling green leaves due to lack of own production factories in the state.The tea growers have exhorted the state government as well BTAD administration to provide financial aid for setting up of tea production factories for self-reliance of the tea farmers.  A joint sitting of the All Bodoland Small Tea Growers’ Association and Small Tea Growers’ Council,Assam was held at DICC conference hall in Kokrajhar on Friday with Jousrang Boro,president of the association in the chair.Tea growers, members both from association and council across the state  participated and discused about the daily wages for labour and their welfare initiatives which are to be paid from the concern growers. The sitting emphasized that small tea growers are coming from root of own investment, self labour as well management by making own responsibility. There are nearly 3 lakh small tea growers across the state and four districts of BTAD region have over ten thousand small tea growers. Lakhs of labours are working in the small tea growers across the state and they are earning their livelihood. Presently,the small tea growers are offering Rs.135-150 per day as daily wage. The small tea growers alleged that due to lack of production facilities,the tea growers are deprived from getting genuine prices of green leaves.Presently, tea producers are getting only Rs.13-15 per kg green leaf which is not sufficient to run a small tea grower unit. Some time,tea growers have to face severe crisis and problems due to unsold green leaves because some time concerned tea estates refuses to buy the green leaves.President of All Bodoland Small Tea Grower’s Association, Jousrang Boro and General Secretary of the Small Tea Growers’ Council,Assam Diganta Phukan told the media persons that the small tea growers are self labour and man!gers, so they have no sufficient labours in their respective unit. The grower units are running with basic ifrastructure,they exhorted the government to extend financial aid to the tea growers and open up entrepreneurship oppurtunities for them.

Godhra Panel Report

29 Sep 2008 - 2:27pm | editor
“There is no meeting of minds, no point of understanding with terrorism. Just a choice: Defeat it or be defeated by it.”
– Tony Blair (Former PM of Britain)

“Do not yield. Do not flinch. Stand up. Stand up with our President and fight (terrorism). We’re Americans. We’ll never surrender.”
– John McCain (US Senator)

The burning of coach no. S-6 & S-7 of Sabarmati Express at Godhra Railway Station (Gujarat) on 27th February 2002 which claimed the lives of 59 people including 25 women, 15 children and kar-sevaks returning from the kar-seva at Ram Janma Bhumi Mandir, Ayodhya, was pre-planned, the Nanavati Inquiry Commission has found. The killing of the 59 people by burning of the train triggered Gujarat-wide communal violence. The report states that about 140 litres of petrol was purchased by Razzak Kurkur and Salim Panwala to execute the conspiracy. As per the Commission’s report, Shaukat Lala and Mohammad Latika had possibly opened the sliding door connecting S-6 and S-7 coaches and entered S-6 through that door. One Hassan Lala had thrown a burning rag which had led to the fire in the S-6 coach.

This conspiracy was hatched at the Aman Guest House on the direction of Maulvi Hussain Umarji and executed by Razzak Kurkur, Salim Panwala, Shaukat Lala, Imran Sheri, Rafique Batuk and Shiraj Bala. The report concluded, “The conspiracy hatched by these persons further appears to be a part of large conspiracy to create terror and distabilise the administration”.

The findings of the Commission constituted by the Government of Gujarat in March 2002 and headed by Supreme Court Justice (retd.) G. T. Nanavati and assisted by another Justice (retd.) Akshay Mehta contradicts the findings of another panel headed by Justice (retd.) U. C. Benerjee which unequivocally stated that the fire was accidental and there was no evidence to suggest that the train carnage was pre-planned. The Benerjee panel was set-up by Railway Minister Shri Laloo Prasad Yadav. The first part of the report was tabled in Gujarat Assembly on Thursday (25th Sept. 2008) which evoked instant criticism from opponent political parties. The opposition in Gujarat Assembly was more upset to learn the report which stated, “There is absolutely no evidence to show that either the Chief Minister or any of the Ministers in his council or police officers had played any role in the Godhra incident”. The Justice Nanavati Commission has filed the first part of the two-part report. While the Commission’s terms of the reference is to probe both the fire on the Sabarmati Express at Godhra on 27th February 2002 and the post-Godhra riots that followed, the first part concentrates on the Godhra train burning. One looks forward to the second part of the report as well as the findings of the Supreme Court appointed Special Investigation Team (S.I.T.) for more comprehensive view of what happened during retaliatory mob fury in 2002 in whole of the state of Gujarat that left one thousand people killed, hundreds of houses and industries burnt and properties worth hundreds of crores of rupees destroyed, more so, the irreparable void created between both the warring communities – Hindus and Muslims. The team is supposed to file its report by December which is when the second part of the Nanavati Commission’s findings is also expected. One hopes they shed more light on Bharatvarsh’s worst religious rioting this decade.

Giving a clean chit to Gujarat CM Narendra Modi in the Godhra train carnage, the Justice Nanavati Commission said, “The kar-sevaks had not done anything and no incident had happened earlier which could have led to the incident which later on happened at Godhra”. The Godhra carnage also led to Gujarat’s first POTA (Prevention of Terrorism Act) case which booked 131 accused of whom 2 died in judicial custody and some are out on bail. Two prime accused, Salim Panwala and Farukh Bhana are absconding and presumed to be in Pakistan. The Commission holds Maulvi Hussain Umarji of Godhra as the mastermind of the train carnage.

Justice Nanavati completely dismisses the theory that a Muslim girl was attacked on Godhra railway platform provoking the attack on the train. He says, “Because the train was running late, they (Muslims) had to make some changes in their plan and circulate a false rumour regarding abducting of a Ghanchi Muslim girl. That was done in order to collect large number of persons near the train and induce them to attack it so that they get sufficient time to go near the train with petrol”. Justice Nanavati also asserts that, “the train did not stop on its own but it was made to stop by pulling the alarm chain from outsides” thus disputing the claim that chain was pulled from inside to stop the train.

The Congress, the Left and Laloo Prasad Yadav called it partisan. The Congress has described the report as a “murder of democracy”. The CPI (M) has called it “piecemeal”. Railway Minister Laloo Prasad Yadav has termed the report untrue and compared its findings with those of the Justice U. C. Benerjee Commission set up as an in-house panel by the Railway Ministry. The Benerjee report had concluded that the Godhra fire had begun inside compartment S-6 of the Sabarmati Express on 27th February 2002. The Nanavati report has, on the other hand, gone along with the findings of the police and eye witness accounts that have held that the compartment was set on fire by a frenzied mob that had gathered on the platform and, in fact, attempted to set fire to other coaches as well. Without going into an analysis of the Nanavati report, it is worth commenting on the perverse responses it has drawn from those politically opposed Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi.

Not bothering to so much as study a report prepared by a former judge of Supreme Court, not caring to go into specific arguments and pointing out logical inconsistencies or flaws, the Congress – UPA and Left leadership trashed Justice Nanavati’s assessment. They have questioned the honesty and credibility of Justice Nanavati but offered no reasons for doing so. Such hit and run tactics could be expected from the familiar bunch of Left–liberal activists who have made a career of Gujarat bashing and who have said that Justice Nanavati has not “inspired much confidence”. This comes from mainstream parties that are running the Union Government. This is alarming.

Consider the hypocracy. The same Justice Nanavati enquired into the anti-Sikh violence following the assassination of Mrs. Indira Gandhi in 1984. On the basis of that Nanavati report, two Congress leaders, Shri Sajjan Kumar and Shri Jagdish Tytler, were put in the dock. Tytler was even forced to resign from the Union Government. The Congress accepted the report as did the UPA allies and Left. The cabal of professional civil right activists hailed Justice Nanavati’s dogged pursuit of the truth. In Delhi, he was a heroic judge, in Gujarat, he is an untrustworthy charlatan.

Till recent past in our country the judicial commission of inquiry had certain sanctity. It was left free of politics and its findings were debated, discussed, disputed and disagreed with – but not debunked wholesale. Even Justice M. C. Jain’s somewhat exaggerated study of the background conspiracy while going into Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination was taken seriously enough for the Congress to withdraw support to the United Front Government and force the country into an election barely 18 months after the previous one. Today, for the same party to ridicule a judicial inquiry and refuse to point out specifically which section it disagrees with, what evidence it feels has not been consulted and why it is flawed, is simply advanced applying all propaganda tactics. The Congress – UPA and the Left cannot denounce and rejec t a report simply because it doesn’t suit their political ends or doesn’t deliver the verdict they would have wanted it to. Tomorrow, the BJP – NDA could play the same game and Bharatiya jurisprudence would be the poorer for it. This is dangerous downfall of credentials of politicians, political parties and the Government. This will have demoralizing affect on legal and bureaucratic set up (judiciary and executive).

- Jagdamba Mall